Three sisters practising social distancingInspired by The Blue Mountains Times
We now think back to our math classes trying to remember the concepts of exponential growth and have new terms like “flatten the curve“ in our lexicon. People online have switched from being “experts” on climate change to fire management, to storm forecasting, to virologists, to public health, to pathology testing. In the next few weeks they will think they are experts in intubation, ventilators and medical equipment procurement. Financial experts are many, with wildly differing views. This will keep going as we work through all the further pending issues and the series of debates, reviews and comparison of countries different responses and outcomes. We then need to brace to see if there will be a second wave of this virus next year.
As I write this the USA has just surpassed Italy and China to have the highest number of raw recorded cases. India is going on lock down and Australia has just limited the maximum general gathering size to two people. The world is changing.
As with all parts of society, bushwalkers have also been impacted. At this stage it is not from the virus itself but from the series of behaviour changes that have been encouraged to slow the spread of the virus that is causing the impacts. Everyone has responded differently to these. Some feeling we need to do a lot more than the government is asking and others saying it is a massive overreaction. Most seem to be adapting to the changes well.
Sometimes what looks like and overreaction is simply effective. It is not always obvious how effective something was and ironically the more effective it is the more likely it is seen to be an overreaction. This is common when you manage a burn for someone. They come in contact with something hot, you encourage then to cool running water quickly and stay there for 10 minutes. Afterwards when they see there is hardly any burning, many people will say, “What an overreaction, the burn is tiny.” Effective management techniques that are not well understood often look like an overreaction. In the case of the pandemic we will see so many different experiences over the world. We will see some countries completely overwhelmed and others that have much more effective control measures. Time will tell how the communities views these differences and how well we learn to prepare for the next pandemic.
Anyway – I digress. I am here to think about what we as individual bushwalkers have done and can do in response to the pandemic.
In an effort to keep bushwalking in clubs safe I came up with recommendations for a large bushwalking group. The context was that they walk in a large range of contexts and have a large population of people considered vulnerable due to being over 70 years old.
“Sometimes what looks like and overreaction is simply effective.
BWA April 2020 | 43
The members adopted the new behaviours very quickly and willingly, a significant number of members and leaders made the wise decision to self-isolate.
I was expecting it to be in place for a few weeks before needing to tighten things up more. However, a week later the NSW government asked organisations to “cancel non-essential activities such as … extra-curricular activities and sporting events”. Although legally we could still operate, we made the decision to pause the program mid-March to better protect members and the broader community. The main issue we saw was not the bushwalking itself but the travel to and from as well as the potential congregating that may be out of our control.
So why all the national park closures?This is a moving target. The moment we send out this article this information will be out of date. It is helpful to remember that the situation and the advice evolve over time.
It is clear why lookouts and popular areas are closed. Lots of people together means an infected person can spread the virus to many more people than if in smaller or less dense groups.
But why the differences across the country with park closures? I was not part of the conversations with these so I do not know the actual rationale but here are the things I suspect played a significant role.
ComplianceThe federal government makes announcements about limits of outdoor gatherings, which started with a limit of 500 then changed to two as I finished the article. Then each event coordinator and land manager needs to work out how they can implement and ensure that. Sometimes managing these potential visitors is difficult; one beach closes so people heard to the next beach announced on Facebook. In national parks many of the areas like popular lookouts, picnic areas, and beaches have no easy way to limit numbers. In some cases they just need to close places to ensure they comply with the pandemic rules.
Staff safety Staff safety is going to be a key decision maker for all organisations. There are so many issues and unknowns in this space at a time like this. It is not just the risk of becoming sick with COVID-19, although this is a real risk, especially in visitor centres and the like. There are extra risks around potential crowd management and other practical new work that needs to be done. One difficult issue to asses will be pre-empting when hospitals and emergency services reach capacity dealing with the outbreak, meaning that the resources are stretched to a point where they may not be able to support staff with other health emergencies.
Visitor and community safetyThe issues under staff safety will still play a roll here, but visitors tend to require more resources in the case of an emergency. I also suspect a key issue here will be around constant messaging. If the government is saying “no non-essential travel” and remote parks that require driving for hours to access are open, then the mixed messaging will cause confusion. So we will see states with lots of smaller quiet parks in built up areas are more likely to stay open, while visitor numbers remain low and social distancing rules been applied. Remote parks are more likely to be closed to help send a clear message.
Community spreadDifferent states and territories have different rates of community spread and imported infections. The timing of closures will vary depending on the rate of community acquired disease.
Capacity buildingIn all emergencies, governments are pretty focused on capacity building. Especially in the case of a pandemic they are very focused on “surge” capacity building. They will be training a range of health care professionals in ICU life support skills.
“Staff safety is going to be a key decision maker for all organisations.
“Remote parks are more likely to be closed to help send a clear message.
“... limits of outdoor gatherings ...
44 | BWA April 2020
State
Parks
Tracks
Lookouts
Comment
More info
NSW
Most open
Most open
Popular ones closed
All campgrounds, most visitor centres, cafes, and high-visitation areas are closed.
ACT
Most open
Most open
Most open
Namadgi NP and Visitors Centre, parts of Tidbinbilla and Bimberi Wilderness area remain closed following fires.
SA
Open
Open
Open
Events are closed and social distancing is been encouraged.
VIC
Most open
Most open
Popular ones closed
Popular sites such as Wilsons Promontory NP have significant limits. Twelve Apostles Visitors Center and Lookouts as well as the 1000 steps are closed.
TAS
Closed
Closed
Closed
After closing huts, then camping sites, Parks Tasmania closed all parks and reserves until further notice.
WA
Open
Open
Open
Group events are cancelled and social distancing is been encouraged.
NT
Some closed
Most open
Most open
Some parks are still closed for season and popular parks are closed due to COVID-19.
QLD
Most open
Most open
Popular ones closed
All camping areas in Queensland national parks, state forests and recreation areas are closed from 26 March 2020 until further notice. Social distancing and hygiene protocols for popular parks are in place.
AUS
Closed
Closed
Closed
After initially offering free entry to many Australian NP, all parks are now closed (including Kakadu and Uluru-Kata Tjuta NPs).
Campsites closed in all states.
46 | BWA April 2020
Personal Hygiene
Minimise your risk of infection andminimise the risk of spreading the virus
Wash hands often
Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds
Rewash hands after touching public surfaces (such as trains, handrails, bus or toilet)
Rewash hands after sneezing or coughing
When soap and water not available, use hand sanitiser with at least 60% alcohol
Cover every cough & sneeze
Cover your sneezes & coughs (with your elbow or tissue)
Dispose of tissues as soon as possible (use a plastic bag until you can dispose of them)
Avoid touching your face
Eyes, mouth, nose are vulnerable to infection (wash hands before touching face)
Social Distancing
Reduce the spread of the virus.Physically distant, but socially connected.
Avoid physical contact
Keep about 1.5 metres from other people
Avoid physical contact (nod or bow instead of handshake)
Create extra space from people sneezing/coughing
Minimise public transport
Minimise time on public transport (walk locally)
Avoid touching surfaces with hands
Minimise car sharing
Keep all car-sharing rides less than 1 hour
Maintain physical separation of people in the car (only two people in a three-person bench seat)
Self Isolation
Limit the spread. Isolate if you are potentially contagious. Protect those who are vulnerable.
Travel limits
Follow government advice and be risk adverse when considering travelling overseas and interstate
No visit very remote communities (as per government advice)
Do not join an activity if you
are required to self-isolate (eg due to overseas travel or known exposure)
have any flu-like symptoms (fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, body aches, sore throat, headache or runny nose)
suspect you are infected or are awaiting test results
are a vulnerable person (Keep up to date your state health updates on who is vulnerable. In unsure seek your doctor’s advice.)
Continue the conversation on Bushwalk.com forum.
BWA April 2020 | 47